ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Utility of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test in perioperative assessment of patients with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative ΔNLR and ΔPNI independently predict postoperative pulmonary complications in non-small cell lung cancer: a difference analysis-based nomogram.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a well-known risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), necessitating careful preoperative evaluation in patients undergoing lung resection surgery. The risk of PPCs in patients with COPD may vary with severity of symptoms, and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score is commonly used to assess patient quality of life and predict acute exacerbations. However, few studies have explored the correlation between CAT score and PPC incidence in COPD. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of CAT scores for PPCs and compare them with other established PPC predictors in mild to moderate COPD. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 83 patients with COPD who underwent preoperative evaluation before lung cancer surgery, including cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs), between January 2020 and June 2022. We compared the predictive value of the following factors for the incidence of PPCs: spirometry, CPETs, 6-min walk tests, symptom-based scores (including CAT scores), the COPD composite severity index, surgery type, comorbidity index, and PPC prediction models. Results: Among the 83 patients, 16 (19.2%) developed PPCs, with persistent air leakage being the most common complication. CAT scores significantly differed between PPC and non-PPC groups (mean value 9.4 Conclusions: CAT scores are valuable for evaluating patients with mild to moderate COPD before lung resection surgery, reliably predicting PPCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.