ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Incidence of early persistent pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-centre prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of structured checklist-assisted multimedia interactive education on postoperative pain management and quality of life in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: A Comparison Between Robotic Surgery and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Effect of ERAS-based refined nursing on postoperative pain management in lung cancer surgery patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Acute postoperative pain management after cardiothoracic surgery: a bibliometric analysis and future directions.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Techniques in Thoracoscopic Lung Resection Patients.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), postoperative acute pain and nerve injury are still present and contribute to early persistent and chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of early persistent pain (EPP) after VATS, which remains unexplored, to enhance patient care and promote awareness among clinicians regarding this clinical condition. Methods: A single-center prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients undergoing VATS between January 2021 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of EPP, defined as pain experienced at 3 to 4 weeks follow-up. Secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with EPP, characteristics during physical examination, acute postoperative pain scores, the use of additional analgesia and complications between patients with and without EPP. Results: Of 117 patients, 16.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9-23%] developed EPP. The presence of acute postoperative pain was the only risk factor for EPP. The pain was mostly localized at the utility and ventral incision. Hyperesthesia, hypoesthesia and a positive pinch test were the most common sensory disturbances. Patients with EPP showed significantly higher acute pain scores until postoperative day (POD) 4, more frequently used additional opioids until POD 2, and had comparable complications. Conclusions: Early persistent postoperative pain is present in 16.2% of patients after VATS. Acute postoperative pain is the strongest risk factor for developing such persistent pain. This underlines that awareness of clinicians for strategies that optimize postoperative pain management is of utmost importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.