ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Reverse triggering in patients with acute brain injury undergoing controlled ventilation.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse triggering (RT) is a ventilatory asynchrony characterized by the activation of respiratory muscles in response to passive mechanical insufflation. Although RT can potentially exacerbate lung injury, its characteristics in patients with acute brain injury remain under-explored. This study aims to elucidate the incidence and factors associated with RT in this patient population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a clinical database dedicated to investigating patient-ventilator asynchrony among individuals with acute brain injury. Only patients under controlled mechanical ventilation were included. RT was identified through an analysis of airway pressure, flow, and esophageal pressure waveforms collected at 15-minute intervals. The incidence of RT was determined by calculating the ratio of the number of RT breaths to the total number of breaths. Results: A total of 334 waveform datasets from 53 patients were analyzed. RT was observed in 8.4% of mechanical insufflations across 59 datasets (17.7%). Sixteen patients (30.2%) experienced at least one RT event. The most prevalent phenotype was mid-cycle RT (61.1%), followed by breath stacking (BD) (16.6%). Independent predictors of RT, after adjusting for confounding factors, included the combined use of opioids and sedatives, lower Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) scores, reduced airway delta pressure, and minimal discrepancies between the set respiratory rate and the actual respiratory rate. The pressure of occlusion at 0.1 seconds (P Conclusions: Factors such as deep sedation, lower airway delta pressure, and close alignment of ventilator and patient respiratory rates were associated with RT in patients with acute brain injury. Additionally, P
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.