ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective single-group phase II clinical study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Concurrent versus sequential immune checkpoint inhibition in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combined with surgery is still the standard treatment mode for esophageal cancer (EC), but the rate of distant metastasis and local recurrence of this triple mode is still high. Distant metastasis is the main recurrence pattern. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore a new treatment model to improve pathologic complete response (pCR) and patient survival. In recognition of the rise of immunotherapy, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nCRT combined with immunotherapy (nRCIT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: A total of 22 patients with locally advanced ESCC were enrolled at our institution between 2019 and 2021. The patients underwent nRCIT therapy. The primary endpoint was pCR; secondary endpoints included major pathologic response (MPR), 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events (AEs). Meanwhile, we enrolled 53 patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT at our institution as the control group between 2012 and 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.374 was performed to balance potential bias. Results: In present work, 17 patients successfully completed nRCIT and esophagectomy, among whom 16 patients achieved R0 resection. After PSM, age, sex, tumor location, length, alcohol history, body mass index (BMI), clinical T stage, lymph node staging, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, and cycles of chemotherapy were comparable between groups. After the operation, 7 patients (41.2%) achieved pCR in both primary tumors and lymph nodes. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 3 patients (17.6%) and 1 patient succumbed to pneumonia during the perioperative period. Leukopenia was observed in 20 patients (90.9%) during neoadjuvant therapy, with grade 3 or higher AEs. The 1- and 2-year OS rates are 88.2% and 65.0%, respectively, in the nRCIT group, whereas 34.1% of patients achieved pCR, with 1- and 2-year OS rates of 82.3% and 68.6%, respectively, in the nCRT group. A significant MPR was observed in 10 out of 17 patients (58.8%) in the nRCIT group. Conclusions: nRCIT may appear to be safe and feasible for locally advanced ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.