Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552848›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy as first-line strategy for isolated aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study.

Mi Hee Lim, Chee-Hoon Lee, Min Ho Ju, Hyung Gon Je

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Minimally invasive approach for ascending aorta aneurysm replacement - next steps in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a case series.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mi Hee LimDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0167-7836
Chee-Hoon LeeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-225X
Min Ho JuDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-8598
Hyung Gon JeDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-2898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive procedures are increasingly implemented in aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgeries to minimize surgical trauma and achieve early patient recovery. We aimed to compare between short- and mid-term outcomes for isolated AVR using the representative minimally invasive approaches of right anterior mini-thoracotomy (RAMT) and partial upper sternotomy [J-sternotomy (JS)]. Methods: Patients (n=832) who had undergone surgical AVR between March 2009 and September 2022 were included. We retrospectively examined and compared data from these two minimally invasive approaches, and performed propensity score matching to account for differences in patient baseline characteristics. Early outcomes and late mortality were compared between the matched groups. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, the study comprised 315 patients who underwent RAMT and 92 who underwent JS. Patients who underwent JS had more comorbidities, compared with those who underwent RAMT. Propensity score matching of 16 variables yielded similar groups for comparison (n=90). Thirty-day mortality was similar between the two groups (0% Conclusions: AVR via RAMT was associated with improved early clinical outcomes, shorter length of stay, and increased survival, compared with JS. Despite the technical challenges associated with RAMT, this procedure can be considered a primary strategy for isolated AVR.

Indexed as

Aortic valveJ-sternotomy (JS)propensity score (PS)thoracotomy

Identifiers

PMID39552848
PMCPMC11565346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.