ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2024
Mendelian randomization study on the causal relationship between chronic hepatitis B/C virus infection and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulmonary Complications in Cirrhosis: Current Concepts and Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is not well understood. Given the known role of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in inducing cirrhosis, the virus has also received attention in the study of IPF. An earlier retrospective study found an increased incidence of IPF in patients with HCV, supported by evidence in the alveolar lavage fluid of the patients, whereas another set of observational studies did not find an association, which prompted us to explore a causal relationship. It is well known that HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) have some similarities: both are RNA viruses, and both have a strong ability to induce cirrhosis, which in turn leads to poor prognosis and increased mortality in patients with viral hepatitis. This factor also inspired us to start exploring whether there is a causal relationship between HBV and IPF. Due to the inherent limitations of previous studies, causality between chronic HBV/HCV infection and IPF is yet to be established. Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variation as exposure and can be used to determine the causal effect of exposure on outcomes. Therefore, we used a two-sample MR study to determine if there is a causal relationship between viral hepatitis and IPF risk. Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used as instrumental variables (IVs), with chronic HBV and HCV infections as exposure factors and IPF as the outcome variable. Three methods, inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median (WM), and MR-Egger regression, were employed for the bidirectional MR. Sensitivity analyses, including horizontal pleiotropy analysis, Cochran's Results: The results of the IVW suggested that there was no causal relationship between chronic HBV infection (OR =1.039, 95% CI: 0.935-1.154, P=0.48) and chronic HCV infection (OR =1.146, 95% CI: 0.834-1.576, P=0.40) and the risk of IPF. Sensitivity analysis showed no evidence of reverse causation, horizontal pleiotropy, and heterogeneity. Conclusions: This study, using the bidirectional MR, provides preliminary evidence that chronic HBV and HCV infections are not causally related to IPF at the genetic level. However, this conclusion requires support from larger sample sizes in genome-wide association study (GWAS) databases for further MR analysis, and additional clinical studies and animal experiments are needed for validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.