ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Prehospital Care for Road Traffic Injury Victims.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Prehospital Emergency Care Resources in Urban and Rural Rwanda Using the WHO Health System Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
- Lived experiences of prehospital care among road traffic accident survivors in Rwanda: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Standardized Nurse-Led Triage Protocols in Improving Outcomes, Timeliness, and Accuracy in Road Traffic and Trauma Care in Low-Resource Settings: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Pre-hospital interventions in snakebite: A telephonic survey and follow up investigating snakebite envenoming from a tertiary care centre in Coastal Karnataka.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prehospital capabilities are inadequately developed to meet the growing needs for emergency care in most low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to describe the prehospital care received by the road traffic injury (RTI) victims presenting to a level I Trauma Care Center in Central Kerala, India. Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective observational study, which included consecutive victims of RTI attending the emergency department within 24-h of the event. A structured interview schedule was developed for collecting the data on various domains and the patients were followed up for their duration of hospital stay. Results: A total of 920 RTI victims, were included in this study. Two percent (17/920) of first responders had some sort of training in trauma care whereas the rest were untrained. The time taken to get any help at the scene after an RTI was 8 ± 12.9 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.16-8.84) and for first medical contact 25 ± 16 min (95% CI 24-26). No attempt at field stabilization occurred in any case. Three percent (26/920) had received some form of prehospital care, like arrest of hemorrhage using a compression bandage and splinting of the fractured limb with a wooden plank. None of the patients received supplemental oxygen, airway management, or cervical spine immobilization at the site of the accident or en route to the hospital. Conclusion: A lack of an organized prehospital care system results in minimal care before hospital admission. Urgent establishment of ambulance services and structured prehospital care tailored to our health-care system is imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.