Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552827›Full record

ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Barriers to Effective Prehospital and Hyperacute Stroke Care in India: A Physician Perspective.

Siju V Abraham, Anita Joy, Ankit Kumar Sahu, Prithvishree Ravindra, Shirshendu Dhar, Ravi Teja, S Vimal Krishnan, Renyu Liu, Anthony George Rudd, Gary A Ford

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siju V AbrahamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Anita JoyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
Ankit Kumar SahuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Prithvishree RavindraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Shirshendu DharDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College, Agartala, Tripura, India.
Ravi TejaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Srikakulam Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
S Vimal KrishnanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Renyu LiuThe World Stroke Organization Taskforce for Prehospital Care, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anthony George RuddThe World Stroke Organization Taskforce for Prehospital Care, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gary A FordThe World Stroke Organization Taskforce for Prehospital Care, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of stroke is increasing in India. Prehospital stroke care is crucial for reducing stroke morbidity and mortality, but its implementation in India faces several challenges. Limited original research exists on prehospital stroke care in India, making it essential to identify the problems in implementing effective prehospital stroke care. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among registered medical practitioners in India who treat acute stroke. The survey questionnaire was developed in English and included 26 questions divided into five parts: questions about the physician's practice setup/hospital in India, perception of community awareness, existing prehospital care/systems, in-hospital stroke care availability, and specific issues faced. Results: Eighty-three doctors in India participated in the survey (43% response rate). Most of the respondents worked in private hospitals (68%) and urban areas (76%). While 89% of hospitals had ambulance services, over 33% reported that patients had to pay for ambulance transport. Among respondents, 12% reported a community stroke care network, with infrequent prehospital procedures such as random blood glucose measurement (22%), stroke identification (15.7%), "last seen normal" documentation (14.5%), and low prehospital notification to hospitals (5%). Delays in referral from peripheral centers were reported by 73% of respondents. Most hospitals had standard operating procedures (SOPs) (84%), computed tomography (CT) (94%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (85%), and offered intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) (77%). However, 24 h availability of CT was reported only by 6%, MRI by 19% and IVT by 12%. Nearly half (45%) reported treatment with thrombolysis was not covered by insurance. Mechanical thrombectomy was available in 34% of hospitals and 63% of hospitals conducted in-hospital audits for stroke patients. Conclusions: The capabilities of stroke-catering hospitals in urban settings are encouraging, with many having SOPs, imaging capabilities, and thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy services. However, there is much room for improvement, in making the essential stroke care services financially accessible to all and available around the clock.

Indexed as

Emergency medical servicesIndiaprehospitalstroke

Identifiers

PMID39552827
PMCPMC11563232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.