Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552789›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium.

Monika Martens, Savina Chham, Zavrnik Črt, Katrien Danhieux, Edwin Wouters, Srean Chhim, Antonija Poplas Susič, Zalika Klemenc Ketiš, Por Ir, Roy Remmen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Monika MartensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1432-0684
Savina ChhamInstitute of Public Health (NIPH), Phnom Penh, Cambodia and Department of Social Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7142-9037
Zavrnik ČrtCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-452X
Katrien DanhieuxDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6064-5335
Edwin WoutersCentre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-3829
Srean ChhimNational Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1558-1875
Antonija Poplas SusičCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-3333
Zalika Klemenc KetišCommunity Health Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-1754
Por IrNational Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3493-2749
Roy RemmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6509-9561
Kerstin Klipstein-GrobuschJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5462-9889
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6344-3007
Grace Marie KuDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-9104
Josefien Van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9724-1887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The ' Methods: We used a multi-case study design, with each country being a case. Document review, focus groups, and stakeholder interviews were conducted. The WHO health system building blocks guided the thematic analysis. We then visualised and examined the interlinkages between barriers in each country. Results: Common challenges to scaling up IC across the three health systems relate to: governance and leadership; health workforce; inadequate health financing system; and fragmented health information systems. In Cambodia, access to non-communicable disease (NCD) services and medicine are important issues. IC scale-up is facilitated by its strong governance and public health service model in Slovenia but health workforce shortages risk progress. In Belgium, the fragmented governance system and predominant fee-for-service provider payment are important barriers. A common response to health workforce and workload challenges was task shifting: to primary care nurses in Belgium, peer supporters in Slovenia, and community health workers in Cambodia. Conclusions: Examining differences and similarities between barriers in each health system stimulated reciprocal learning. Interactions between health system barriers in specific contexts require further attention to move complex health systems forward.

Indexed as

complexityintegrated caremultiple case study designqualitative researchscale-up

Identifiers

PMID39552789
PMCPMC11568809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.