ReviewResearch and reports in urology2024
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Refractory Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC): Current Guidance and Experience from Clinical Practice.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of combination versus single-agent immunotherapy for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Reappraising intravesical gemcitabine in BCG-unresponsive nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: lessons from contemporary re-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Nanotechnology in oncology: advances in biosynthesis, drug delivery, and theranostics.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Advancements in bladder cancer immunotherapy: a focus on intravesical approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BCG is the standard of care for non-muscle invasive high-risk bladder cancer. Notwithstanding the high rate of cure, cancer may recur. A non-muscle invasive high-risk recurrence may be defined as BCG refractory or naïve. BCG refractory patients have been further divided into BCG unresponsive and BCG exposed. A recurrent high-risk bladder cancer within 1 year after BCG induction plus maintenance or two courses of BCG induction defines an unresponsive disease. Any recurrence after 24 months since induction and maintenance should be considered as BCG naïve. The remaining cases are BCG exposed. The standard of care for BCG exposed and naïve patients is another cycle of BCG in the first place, while radical cystectomy should be discussed as alternative with the patient. The preferred therapy for BCG unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy according to AUA or EAU guidelines. However, systemic immunotherapy with pembrolizumab or gene therapy with intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec may be administered for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy with outcomes superior to intravesical docetaxel, gemcitabine or valrubicin. Our narrative review tries to elucidate BCG refractory definition and treatment specifically regarding alternative therapies to radical cystectomy yet approved or under investigation. The last years have been exciting regarding new developments in this field after a long period of stagnation. Unfortunately, data available on some alternative therapies are mainly limited mainly to Phase I or II studies with a lack of robust evidence, but a clear trend in future treatments has just been drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.