ReviewCurrent cardiovascular risk reports2024
Machine Learning in Vascular Medicine: Optimizing Clinical Strategies for Peripheral Artery Disease.
Review in Current cardiovascular risk reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Review
- Innovations in MRI and AI Integration for Vascular Plaque Evaluation and Overview of Deep Learning Techniques in Peripheral Vascular Disease.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), a condition affecting millions of patients, is often underdiagnosed due to a lack of symptoms in the early stages and management can be complex given differences in genetic and phenotypic characteristics. This review aims to provide readers with an update on the utility of machine learning (ML) in the management of PAD. Recent Findings: Recent research leveraging electronic health record (EHR) data and ML algorithms have demonstrated significant advances in the potential use of automated systems, namely artificial intelligence (AI), to accurately identify patients who might benefit from further PAD screening. Additionally, deep learning algorithms can be used on imaging data to assist in PAD diagnosis and automate clinical risk stratification.ML models can predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) with considerable accuracy, with many studies also demonstrating the ability to more accurately risk stratify patients for deleterious outcomes after surgical intervention. These predictions can assist physicians in developing more patient-centric treatment plans and allow for earlier, more aggressive management of modifiable risk-factors in high-risk patients. The use of proteomic biomarkers in ML models offers a valuable addition to traditional screening and stratification paradigms, though clinical utility may be limited by cost and accessibility. Summary: The application of AI to the care of PAD patients may enable earlier diagnosis and more accurate risk stratification, leveraging readily available EHR and imaging data, and there is a burgeoning interest in incorporating biological data for further refinement. Thus, the promise of precision PAD care grows closer. Future research should focus on validating these models via real-world integration into clinical practice and prospective evaluation of the impact of this new care paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.