ReviewCureus2024
Innovative Nanotechnological Approaches in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Here today, gone tomorrow: the transformative role of biodegradable materials in modern trauma care.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- 3D Bioprinting for Custom Bone Grafts in Orthopaedic Trauma: Current Advances and Clinical Translation.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of nanotechnology to health has been one of the revolutionizing factors in the field of trauma and orthopaedic surgery over the last decade. Advances in nanomedicine, in comparison to conventional modes of treatment, have influenced immensely the approach towards trauma and orthopaedic surgery and provided some unique answers to some very complex problems like bone reconstruction, soft tissue repair, and prevention of infection. The current narrative review intends to underpin an extensive analysis of modern applications and recent advances in nanotechnology-driven therapies in orthopaedics. Having leveraged unique properties inherent in nanoparticles and nanoscale materials, novel interventions, such as nanostructured scaffolds, drug delivery systems, and bioactive coatings, have flourished into a variety of promising means to enhance osseointegration, accelerate the healing process, and reduce postoperative complications. This review at once acknowledges the huge potential of these technologies and some of the problems impeding their wide-range clinical application, including long-term safety, main regulatory hurdles, and scale-up issues. The following review aims to give orthopaedic surgeons, researchers, and biomedical engineers an overview of the present status and perspectives for the future regarding nanomedicine in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, pointing out the expectations of a much-improved outcome in patients and overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.