Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552736›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Fractures of the Hamate Bone: A Review of Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis and Management in the United Kingdom.

Muhammad Arham Sahu, Abdullah Tahir, Muhammad Ashal Sahu, Adam Varachia, Haseeb Khawar, Usman Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Arham SahuTrauma and Orthopaedics, Hereford County Hospital, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford, GBR.
Abdullah TahirTrauma and Orthopaedics, Hereford County Hospital, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford, GBR.
Muhammad Ashal SahuSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, GBR.
Adam VarachiaSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, GBR.
Haseeb KhawarTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Nottingham NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.
Usman AhmedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury to the hamate can result in significant functional impairment and a negative impact on quality of life. These injuries, in general, occur very infrequently, and in the setting of an increasingly ageing population and more patients presenting post falls, clinicians are at risk of either misdiagnosing or failing to diagnose patients who sustain hamate fractures. This review finds that hamate fractures can occur through acute trauma or chronic repetitive stress. These injuries are often missed resulting in a delay to management. Common presenting features of hamate fractures include ulnar-sided palmar tenderness and paraesthesia in the ulnar nerve distribution, loss of grip strength and pain on swinging a gripped object. In examination, the hamate "pull test" is a highly sensitive test for hamate fractures. CT scan of the carpal bones is shown to be the gold standard investigation for the diagnosis of such injuries. Initial management of hamate fractures in the United Kingdom is in line with the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines that involves immobilisation with a suitable splint and sling for comfort, adequate analgesia, rest and elevation. Specific management of hamate fractures is divided into conservative and surgical options; however, this review identifies the need for further research into which form of management is superior.

Indexed as

carpal fractureshamatehamate fracturehand trauma managementhook of hamate

Identifiers

PMID39552736
PMCPMC11569506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.