Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2024

The Acari Hypothesis, V: deciphering allergenicity.

Andrew C Retzinger, Gregory S Retzinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew C RetzingerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Camden Clark Medical Center, West Virginia University, Parkersburg, WV, United States.
Gregory S RetzingerDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Acari Hypothesis posits that acarians, i.e., mites and ticks, are operative agents of allergy. It derived from observations that allergens are molecular elements of acarians or acarian foodstuffs. A corollary of The Hypothesis provides how acarian dietary elements are selected as allergens; namely, a pattern recognition receptor native to the acarian digestive tract complexes with dietary molecules problematic to the acarian. By virtue of its interspecies operability, the receptor then enables not only removal of the dietary elements by the acarian immune system, but also-should such a complex be inoculated into a human-production of an element-specific IgE. Because pattern recognition receptors bind to molecules problematic to the organism from which the receptors originate, it follows that molecules targeted by adaptive IgE, i.e., allergens, must be problematic to acarians. This claim is supported by evidence that host organisms, when infested by acarians, upregulate representative members of allergenic molecular families. Appreciation of the relationship between allergens and acarians provides insight well beyond allergy, shedding light also on the anti-acarian defenses of many living things, especially humans.

Indexed as

allergenicitychitinasescystatinsdefensinsFRePperoxidasesPR-10 proteinsthe acari hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID39552700
PMCPMC11565521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.