Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552628›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2024

Being Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer, or Intersex (LGBTQI) and Christian: A Scoping Review of Theories and Constructs in Psychological Research.

Catarina Rêgo-Moreira, Tiago Rocha-Silva, Liliana Rodrigues, Conceição Nogueira

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catarina Rêgo-MoreiraCenter for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6457-1070
Tiago Rocha-SilvaCenter for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3564-4423
Liliana RodriguesCenter for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-9634
Conceição NogueiraCenter for Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9152-754X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to map theories and constructs used in psychological research to address LGBTQI and Christian belonging. Through the scoping review method aligned with PRISMA-Extension for Scoping Reviews, we revised 150 studies from the psychological field between 2012 and 2022. We found conflict/negative theories, a turning point from negative to increasingly positive frameworks, exclusively positive perspectives, and broader and challenging theories. There is a gradual shift from conflict/negative perspectives to include positive and broader theories. These findings are critical to base and expand new approaches regarding LGBTQI issues and Christianity in future research.

Indexed as

ChristianityLGBTQIpsychological researchscoping review

Identifiers

PMID39552628
PMCPMC11562956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.