Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552614›Full record

ReviewBJR open2024

Post-mortem CT service structures in non-suspicious death investigations.

Natasha Davendralingam, Amy-Lee Brookes, Mohammad Ali Shah, Susan C Shelmerdine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natasha DavendralingamDepartment of Radiology, Tameside & Glossop NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lynne, OL6 9RW, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-1119
Amy-Lee BrookesRoyal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, United Kingdom.
Mohammad Ali ShahDepartment of Radiology, St George's Hospital, London, SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
Susan C ShelmerdineDepartment of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3BH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-9967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-mortem CT (PMCT) is increasingly used in adult post-mortem investigations as a non-invasive alternative to traditional autopsies. Using PMCT supports death investigations in the face of severe pathologist workforce shortages and the less invasive nature maintains respect for cultural sensitivities. This article reviews the diverse service structures of PMCT, highlighting the importance of customizing these structures to meet the specific needs of various coronial jurisdictions. These jurisdictions often face challenges such as limited access to imaging facilities and logistical issues with geographically dispersed mortuaries. We outline options for leading and operating PMCT services, including models led by pathologists, radiologist, or a hybrid of the two; use of static, relocatable, or mobile CT scanning units; as well as making the most of existing resources such as NHS or private scanning facility scanners already in place. We also explore different PMCT reporting structures through in-house NHS radiologists, combined in-house and teleradiology, or fully outsourced teleradiology services. Each of these offerings provides different levels of efficiency, cost-effectiveness, data security and challenges to set-up. Where applicable, we present and describe real-world examples as case studies for readers interested in replicating existing models.

Indexed as

autopsycomputed tomographypostmortemradiologyservice models

Identifiers

PMID39552614
PMCPMC11568351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.