ArticleBJR open2024
Measuring brain perfusion by CT or MR as ancillary tests for diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BJR open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To gather and synthesize evidence regarding diagnostic accuracy of perfusion imaging by CT (CTP) or MR (MRP) for brain death (BD) diagnosis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336353) and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and independently by 3 reviewers. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant studies. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to assess studies' quality. Meta-analysis was performed using univariate random-effects models. Results: Ten studies (328 patients) were included. Perfusion imaging (most commonly CTP, Conclusions: The sensitivity of CTP or MRP for BD diagnosis is very high, comparable to CTA and TCD. However, considering most studies were retrospective, and lacked control groups and unambiguous criteria for perfusion imaging in BD assessment, results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies, ideally prospective, multi-centre, and with control groups are of utmost importance for validation of these methods, particularly with standardized technical parameters. Advances in knowledge: Cerebral perfusion imaging using CT or MRI demonstrates high sensitivity in diagnosing BD, on par with CTA and TCD. Recommended by the World Brain Death group, this method holds promise for further investigation in this area. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022336353.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.