ReviewNeurogastroenterology and motility2025
Treatment principles in adults and development of patient-reported outcomes in cyclic vomiting syndrome.
Review in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment principles in adults and development of patient-reported outcomes in cyclic vomiting syndrome.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCyclic vomiting syndrome is a chronic disorder of gut-brain interaction that is present in both adults and children. It is characterized by severe nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and several non-GI symptoms. It is also associated with several comorbid conditions such as anxiety and depression, which affect overall health care outcomes.
methodsThis article delineates treatment principles, encompassing both abortive interventions and prophylactic regimens currently recommended for CVS. However, it underscores a critical concern: the absence of FDA-approved medications for CVS treatment, with existing therapies relying on retrospective and open-labeled trials. KEY
resultsThis article emphasizes the pressing need for the development of CVS-specific outcome assessment tools to facilitate more accurate evaluation and robust data collection for the future studies. In exploring this deficiency, the manuscript also presents the up-to-date data and development that enhances our comprehension of patient-centric concepts, and the challenges faced in creating CVS-specific tools, and presents a roadmap for their development. Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing our understanding of CVS and optimizing patient care. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: This elucidates the current state of CVS management but also advocates for a future where tailored tools enhance our ability to measure and improve the outcomes for individuals with this debilitating disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.