ArticlePlant, cell & environment2025
Individual Versus Combined Effects of Warming, Elevated CO
Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon Gain, Carbon Use, and Persistence: How Elevated CO₂ and Warming Reshape High-Elevation Plants.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- Synergistic effects of warming and elevated COScience advances · 2026Article
- Elevated CO2, warming and drought differentially impact reproductive and vegetative economic traits in two grassland species.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Structure and Functions of NDR1/HIN1-Like (NHL) Proteins in Plant Development and Response to Environmental Stresses.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing warming, atmospheric CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.