Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552341›Full record

ReviewHealth policy and planning2024

Climate and health: a path to strategic co-financing?

Josephine Borghi, Soledad Cuevas, Blanca Anton, Domenico Iaia, Giulia Gasparri, Mark A Hanson, Agnès Soucat, Flavia Bustreo, Etienne V Langlois

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josephine BorghiGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H9SH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0482-5451
Soledad CuevasINSTITUTO DE ECONOMÍA, GEOGRAFÍA Y DEMOGRAFÍA (IEGD), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid 28037, Spain.
Blanca AntonGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H9SH, UK.
Domenico IaiaPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (PMNCH), WHO, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Giulia GasparriPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (PMNCH), WHO, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Mark A HansonPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (PMNCH), WHO, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Agnès SoucatHealth and Social Protection, Agence Française de Développement (AfD), Paris 75598, France.
Flavia BustreoFondation Botnar, Basel 4052, Switzerland.
Etienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (PMNCH), WHO, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001World Health Organization Centre for Health Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging the co-benefits of investments in health and climate can be best achieved by moving away from isolated financing approaches and adopting co-financing strategies, which aim to improve the outcomes of both sectors. We propose a framework for studying co-financing for health and climate that considers the degree of integration between sector funding, and whether arrangements are 'passive', when cross-sectoral goals are indirectly affected, or 'strategic', when they are pre-emptively supported to build resilience and sustainability. We conducted a rigorous, evidence-focused review to describe co-financing mechanisms according to a framework, including the context in which they have been employed, and to identify enablers and barriers to implementation. We searched the international literature using Pubmed and Web of Science from 2013 to 2023, the websites of key health and climate agencies for grey literature and consulted with stakeholders. Our review underscores the significant impact of climate change and related hazards on government, health insurance and household health-related costs. Current evidence primarily addresses passive co-financing, reflecting the financial consequences of inaction. Strategic co-financing is under explored, as are integrative co-financing models demanding cross-sectoral coordination. Current instances of strategic co-financing lack sufficient funding to demonstrate their effectiveness. Climate finance, an under used resource for health, holds potential to generate additional revenue for health. Realizing these advantages necessitates co-benefit monitoring to align health, climate mitigation and adaptation goals, alongside stronger advocacy for the economic and environmental benefits of health investments. Strategic co-financing arrangements are vital at all system levels, demanding increased cross-sectoral collaboration, additional funding and skills for climate integration within health sector plans and budgets, and mainstreaming health into climate adaptation and mitigation plans. Supporting persistent health needs post-disasters, promoting adaptive social protection for health and climate risks, and disseminating best practices within and among countries are crucial, supported by robust evaluations to enhance progress.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeHumansInsurance, Healthadaptationclimate financeco-financingHealth financingmitigation

Identifiers

PMID39552341
PMCPMC11959176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.