SynthesisEuropean journal of haematology2025
Treatment of Critical Bleeds in Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guideline on the emergency management of critical bleeding in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of eltrombopag, hetrombopag and romiplostim for second-line treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Platelet Transfusion for Patients with Cancer: An Update.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2025Review
- Four-year complete remission with reduced-dose PARP inhibitor in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer harboring a BRCA1 mutation: a case report of a chemotherapy-intolerant patient with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEvidence-based protocols for managing bleeding emergencies in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are lacking. We conducted a systematic review of treatments for critical bleeding in patients with ITP.
methodsWe included all study designs and extracted data in aggregate or individually for patients who received one or more interventions and for whom any of the following outcomes were reported: platelet count response, bleeding, disability, or death.
resultsWe identified 49 eligible studies reporting 112 critical bleed patients with ITP, including 66 children (median age, 10 years), 36 adults (median age, 41.5 years), and 10 patients with unreported age. Patients received corticosteroids (n = 67), IVIG (n = 49), platelet transfusions (n = 41), TPO-RAs (n = 17), and splenectomy (n = 28) either alone or in combination. Studies reported 29 different treatment combinations, the 5 most common were corticosteroids, platelet transfusion and splenectomy (n = 13), corticosteroids and IVIG (n = 13), or splenectomy alone (n = 13); IVIG alone (n = 11); and corticosteroids, IVIG and TPO-RA (n = 8). Mortality among patients with critical bleeds in ITP was 30.6% for adults and 19.7% for children.
conclusionsThe effects of individual treatments on patient outcomes were uncertain due to very low-quality evidence. There is a need for a standardized approach to the treatment of ITP critical bleeds. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42020161206.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.