ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
A bootstrapping residuals approach to determine the error in quantitative functional lung imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Center Repeatability, Consistency, and Comparison of 3D Phase-Resolved Functional (PREFUL) Ventilation MRI at 3 and 1.5 T in Healthy Volunteers.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- A bootstrapping residuals approach to determine the error in quantitative functional lung imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo implement and validate an algorithm to determine the statistical errors in self-gated non-contrast-enhanced functional lung imaging.
methodsA bootstrapping residuals approach to determine the error in quantitative functional lung imaging is proposed. Precision and accuracy of the median error over the lungs, as well as reproducibility of the approach were investigated in 7 volunteers. The algorithm was additionally applied to data acquired in a patient with cystic fibrosis.
resultsThe obtained bootstrapping error maps appear comparable to the error maps determined from repeated measurements, and median absolute error values for both methods show comparable median errors when reducing the number of averages. In a volunteer in whom 10 consecutive measurements were carried out, the median functional parameters were ventilation = 0.22 mL gas/mL lung tissue, perfusion amplitude = 0.028, perfusion timing = -82 ms, whereas precision and accuracy of the median error were below 3.2 × 10
conclusionUsing a bootstrapping residuals method, the error of functional lung MRI could be determined without the need for repeated measurements. The error values can be determined reproducibly and can be used as a future means of quality control for functional lung MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.