ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Contribution of physiological dynamics in predicting major depressive disorder severity.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physiological responses to acute psychological stress as a biomarker for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological bulletinPooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Heart Rate Variability as an Instrument to Understand the Connection Between Psychologic and Psychiatric Conditions and the Heart.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Acupoint temperature as a biomarker: infrared thermography in the diagnosis of adolescents with major depressive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Contribution of physiological dynamics in predicting major depressive disorder severity.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the physiological dynamics of cognitive stress in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and design a multiparametric model for objectively measuring severity of depression. Physiological signal recordings from 40 MDD patients and 40 healthy controls were collected in a baseline stage, in a stress-inducing stage using two cognitive tests, and in the recovery period. Several features were extracted from electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, electrodermal activity, respiration, and temperature. Differences between values of these features under different conditions were used as indexes of autonomic reactivity and recovery. Finally, a linear model was designed to assess MDD severity, using the Beck Depression Inventory scores as the outcome variable. The performance of this model was assessed using the MDD condition as the response variable. General physiological hyporeactivity and poor recovery from stress predict depression severity across all physiological signals except for respiration. The model to predict depression severity included gender, body mass index, cognitive scores, and mean heart rate recovery, and achieved an accuracy of 78%, a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 59%. There is an observed correlation between the behavior of the autonomic nervous system, assessed through physiological signals analysis, and depression severity. Our findings demonstrated that decreased autonomic reactivity and recovery are linked with an increased level of depression. Quantifying the stress response together with a cognitive evaluation and personalization variables may facilitate a more precise diagnosis and monitoring of depression, enabling the tailoring of therapeutic interventions to individual patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.