Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552115›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation.

Madeline Hawke, Linda Sweet, Julie Considine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madeline HawkeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8056-4222
Linda SweetSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-1186
Julie ConsidineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-2456

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Deakin University Postgraduate Research Scholarship and Eastern Health Foundation scholarship.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making is recommended as a person-centred approach to decision-making in antenatal care. Little is known about the implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care.

objectiveAn exploratory study to understand how shared decision-making is implemented in antenatal clinics and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians' use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women.

methodsTwenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m

resultsTwelve clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. The total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean score of 9 and a median of 9.5 indicating low implementation of shared decision-making by clinicians and limited involvement of women in decision-making. No difference was observed in OPTION12 scores in decision-making for women by body mass index.

conclusionThis study suggests that shared decision-making is limited in the antenatal clinic setting for all women, regardless of body mass index. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this exploratory study. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The perspectives of women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexDecision Making, SharedPrenatal CareAdultAustraliaDecision MakingFemaleHumansPatient ParticipationPregnancydecision making, sharedmidwiferymidwivesobesity, maternalobstetricianweight prejudice

Identifiers

PMID39552115
PMCPMC11570676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.