Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39552062›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2024

Positioning tezepelumab for patients with severe asthma: from evidence to unmet needs.

Carlo Lombardi, Marcello Cottini, Annamaria Bosi, Francesco Menzella

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlo LombardiDepartmental Unit of Allergology, Clinical Immunology & Pneumology, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Marcello CottiniAllergy and Pneumology Outpatient Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.
Annamaria BosiPulmonology Unit, S. Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna (TV), AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Italy.
Francesco MenzellaPulmonology Unit, S. Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna (TV), AULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3950-5789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several endotypes of severe asthma with predominantly type 2 inflammation can be distinguished by the immune pathways driving the inflammatory processes. However, in the absence of type 2 inflammation, asthma is less clearly defined and is generally associated with poor responses to conventional anti-asthmatic therapies. Studies have shown that disruption of the epithelial barrier triggers inflammatory responses and increases epithelial permeability. A key aspect of this process is that epithelial cells release alarmin cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), in response to allergens and infections. Among these cytokines, TSLP has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for severe asthma, leading to the development of a new biologic, tezepelumab (TZP). By blocking TSLP, TZP may produce wide-ranging effects. Based on positive clinical trial results, TZP appears to offer a promising, safe, and effective treatment approach. This narrative review examines the evidence for treating severe asthma with TZP, analyses clinical trial findings, and provides clinicians with practical insights into identifying patients who may respond best to this novel biologic therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaCytokinesClinical Trials as TopicHumansSeverity of Illness IndexThymic Stromal LymphopoietinAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytokinestezepelumabThymic Stromal LymphopoietinalarminAsthma phenotypebiologicsendotypetezepelumabthymic stromal lymphopoietin

Identifiers

PMID39552062
PMCPMC11571243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.