Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551967›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2024

In Vivo Time-Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning.

Elena V Potapova, Valery V Shupletsov, Viktor V Dremin, Evgenii A Zherebtsov, Andrian V Mamoshin, Andrey V Dunaev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena V PotapovaResearch & Development Center of Biomedical Photonics, Orel State University, Orel, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-6308
Valery V ShupletsovResearch & Development Center of Biomedical Photonics, Orel State University, Orel, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-0024-8518
Viktor V DreminResearch & Development Center of Biomedical Photonics, Orel State University, Orel, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6974-3505
Evgenii A ZherebtsovOptoelectronics and Measurement Techniques Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-1430
Andrian V MamoshinResearch & Development Center of Biomedical Photonics, Orel State University, Orel, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1787-5156
Andrey V DunaevResearch & Development Center of Biomedical Photonics, Orel State University, Orel, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4431-6288

Funding

This research was supported by Russian Science Foundation (Grant Number 21-15-00325).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOne of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time-resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy-type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time-resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine-needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared.

resultsOur results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90.

conclusionsThese promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00-00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsMachine LearningHumansOptical ImagingSpectrometry, Fluorescenceliver cancermachine learningoptical biopsypercutaneous needle biopsytime‐resolved fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID39551967
PMCPMC11629289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.