ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Survivorship care plans and adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among cancer survivors in a national sample.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe impact of the components of survivorship care plans on adherence to cancer screening guidelines among cancer survivors is limited. We examined the association of receipt of treatment summaries, follow-up instructions, and type of doctor providing survivorship care with adherence to breast cancer screening (BCS) and cervical cancer screening (CCS) guidelines in female cancer survivors.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from 2014, 2016 and 2018 was conducted. BCS and CCS-eligible women were aged 40-74 and 30-64, respectively. BCS adherence was defined as a mammogram within 2 years and CCS adherence as a pap smear within 3 years or HPV test within 5 years. Univariate analysis with chi-square and multivariable logistic regression are reported.
results5,001 BCS and 3,014 CCS-eligible survivors were identified. In the BCS group, recipients of treatment summaries and follow-up instructions were significantly more adherent with BCS (84.1% vs. 77.4%; 83.4% vs. 74%, respectively, p < 0.001). In the CCS group, recipients of follow-up instructions were significantly more adherent with CCS (78.1% vs. 67.7%, p < 0.001). In both groups, there was no significant difference in BCS or CCS based on type of physician providing care (p = 0.087). On multivariate analysis, receipt of follow-up instructions was the only factor significantly associated with BCS (OR:2.81; 95%CI:1.76-4.49) and CCS (OR:3.14; 95%CI:1.88-5.23).
conclusionsFollow-up instructions, as part of survivorship care plans, have the strongest association with BCS and CCS among female cancer survivors. Additional research should focus on improving the distribution of survivorship care plans, particularly follow-up instructions, as a method to increase BCS and CCS among cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.