Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551893›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Validation of direct recording of electrically evoked cortical auditory evoked potentials through a cochlear implant system.

Don Bell-Souder, Chen Chen, Anthony Spahr, Anu Sharma

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Don Bell-SouderDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Chen ChenDepartment of Research and Technology, Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, CA, USA.
Anthony SpahrDepartment of Research and Technology, Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, CA, USA.
Anu SharmaDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. anu.sharma@colorado.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CI) are one of the most successful treatments available to enable individuals with severe to profound hearing loss to regain access to the world of sound. This is accomplished through the electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using electrodes implanted inside the cochlea. The use of subjective user feedback makes the process of fitting these devices much more challenging in cases where users are not able to actively or accurately report their experience (e.g. pediatrics), making an objective measurement that reflects the accuracy or effectiveness of a program quite attractive. We recorded one objective measure, the electrically-stimulated cortical auditory evoked potential (eCAEP), non-invasively using the CI in response to a simulated speech sound in seven adult participants and compared it to their eCAEP recorded using a scalp EEG set-up. The eCAEPs recorded with CI electrodes were comparable to scalp recorded eCAEPs (grand mean cross-correlation of r = 0.83, individual mean cross-correlations ranged from 0.13 to 0.70). Evoked potential peaks P1, N1 and P2 showed no significant latency difference based on if the eCAEP was recorded on the scalp or using the CI. The eCAEP waveforms recorded via the CI appear to converge in a distinct P1-N1-P2 waveform by as early as 130 sweeps. In conclusion, in this study we show the feasibility of recording the eCAEP directly through the CI system, which could potentially be used to guide CI fitting and track auditory cortex development in response to CI use.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAdultAuditory CortexCochlear ImplantationElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAuditory cortexCochear implantCortical auditory evoked potentialEEGHearing lossMaturation

Identifiers

PMID39551893
PMCPMC11570646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.