Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative efficacy of anteroposterior and lateral X-ray based deep learning in the detection of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Chulho Kim, Minjae Kang, Woon Tak Yuh, Seung-Lee Lee, Jae Jun Lee, Jong-Uk Hou, Suk Hyung Kang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics of 744 inpatients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chulho KimDepartment of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Minjae KangDivision of Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Woon Tak YuhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 7 Keunjaebong-gil, Hwaseong, Korea.
Seung-Lee LeeDivision of Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Jae Jun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Jong-Uk HouDivision of Software, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea. juhou@hallym.ac.kr.
Suk Hyung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. nscharisma@hanmail.net.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C1498National Research Foundation of Korea 2022RIS-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), but the use of X-ray imaging, particularly anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, is prevalent due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. We aim to assess whether the performance of AP images-based deep learning is comparable compared to those using lateral images. This retrospective study analyzed X-ray images from two tertiary teaching hospitals, involving 1,507 patients for the training and internal test, and 104 patients for the external test. The EfficientNet-B5-based algorithms were employed to classify OVCF and non-OVCF group. The model was trained with a 1:1 balanced dataset and validated through 5-fold cross validation. Performance outcomes were compared with the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Out of a total of 1,507 patients, 799 were included in the training dataset and 708 were included in the internal test dataset. The training and internal test datasets were matched 1:1 as OVCF and non-OVCF patients. The DL model showed comparable classifying performance with internal test data (N = 708, AUROC for AP, 0.915; AUROC for lateral, 0.953) and external test data (N = 104, AUROC for AP, 0.982; AUROC for lateral, 0979), respectively. The other performances including F1 score and accuracy were also comparable. Especially, The AUROC of AP and lateral x-ray image-based DL was not significantly different (p for DeLong test = 0.604). The EfficientNet-B5 algorithms using AP X-ray images shows comparable efficacy for classifying OVCF and non-OVCF compared to lateral images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveX-RaysAnteroposteriorDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyLateral viewsMachine learning in radiologyOsteoporotic vertebral compression fracturesX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID39551876
PMCPMC11570669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.