ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparative efficacy of anteroposterior and lateral X-ray based deep learning in the detection of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Large Language Model and Pediatric Neurosurgery - A Neurosurgeon's Perspective on the Artificial Nervous System.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Labial-gland artificial intelligence model screening for autoimmune thyroiditis among patients with connective tissue disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT-Based Planning for Unilateral Pedicle Approach PVP Reduces Cement Leakage and Improves Radiological Outcomes in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Article
- [Analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics of 744 inpatients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), but the use of X-ray imaging, particularly anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, is prevalent due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness. We aim to assess whether the performance of AP images-based deep learning is comparable compared to those using lateral images. This retrospective study analyzed X-ray images from two tertiary teaching hospitals, involving 1,507 patients for the training and internal test, and 104 patients for the external test. The EfficientNet-B5-based algorithms were employed to classify OVCF and non-OVCF group. The model was trained with a 1:1 balanced dataset and validated through 5-fold cross validation. Performance outcomes were compared with the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Out of a total of 1,507 patients, 799 were included in the training dataset and 708 were included in the internal test dataset. The training and internal test datasets were matched 1:1 as OVCF and non-OVCF patients. The DL model showed comparable classifying performance with internal test data (N = 708, AUROC for AP, 0.915; AUROC for lateral, 0.953) and external test data (N = 104, AUROC for AP, 0.982; AUROC for lateral, 0979), respectively. The other performances including F1 score and accuracy were also comparable. Especially, The AUROC of AP and lateral x-ray image-based DL was not significantly different (p for DeLong test = 0.604). The EfficientNet-B5 algorithms using AP X-ray images shows comparable efficacy for classifying OVCF and non-OVCF compared to lateral images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.