ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced breast cancer diagnosis through integration of computer vision with fusion based joint transfer learning using multi modality medical images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- An Efficient Cross-Modal Interaction and Dynamic Fusion Network for Multimodal Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Cross-modal attentive fusion network for tri-modal lesion growth prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Breast ultrasound images for segmentation and classification using multi-task U-Net.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal integration strategies for clinical application in oncology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Improved classification of oral cancer through a personalized transfer learning CNN architecture.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a type of cancer which progresses and spreads from breast tissues and gradually exceeds the entire body; this kind of cancer originates in both sexes. Prompt recognition of this disorder is most significant in this phase, and it is measured by providing patients with the essential treatment so their efficient lifetime can be protected. Scientists and researchers in numerous studies have initiated techniques to identify tumours in early phases. Still, misperception in classifying skeptical lesions can be due to poor image excellence and dissimilar breast density. BC is a primary health concern, requiring constant initial detection and improvement in analysis. BC analysis has made major progress recently with combining multi-modal image modalities. These studies deliver an overview of the segmentation, classification, or grading of numerous cancer types, including BC, by employing conventional machine learning (ML) models over hand-engineered features. Therefore, this study uses multi-modality medical imaging to propose a Computer Vision with Fusion Joint Transfer Learning for Breast Cancer Diagnosis (CVFBJTL-BCD) technique. The presented CVFBJTL-BCD technique utilizes feature fusion and DL models to effectively detect and identify BC diagnoses. The CVFBJTL-BCD technique primarily employs the Gabor filtering (GF) technique for noise removal. Next, the CVFBJTL-BCD technique uses a fusion-based joint transfer learning (TL) process comprising three models, namely DenseNet201, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2. The stacked autoencoders (SAE) model is implemented to classify BC diagnosis. Finally, the horse herd optimization algorithm (HHOA) model is utilized to select parameters involved in the SAE method optimally. To demonstrate the improved results of the CVFBJTL-BCD methodology, a comprehensive series of experimentations are performed on two benchmark datasets. The comparative analysis of the CVFBJTL-BCD technique portrayed a superior accuracy value of 98.18% and 99.15% over existing methods under Histopathological and Ultrasound datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.