Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551847›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

Deep learning for oncologic treatment outcomes and endpoints evaluation from CT scans in liver cancer.

Yujia Xia, Jie Zhou, Xiaolei Xun, Luke Johnston, Ting Wei, Ruitian Gao, Yufei Zhang, Bobby Reddy, Chao Liu, Geoffrey Kim and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yujia Xia *Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Jie Zhou *SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Xiaolei XunStatistics in Global Statistics and Data Science, Beigene, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Luke JohnstonSJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Ting WeiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Ruitian GaoDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yufei ZhangDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-8886
Bobby ReddyPiHealth USA, 55 Cambridge Parkway, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Chao LiuPiHealth USA, 55 Cambridge Parkway, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Geoffrey KimPiHealth USA, 55 Cambridge Parkway, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Jin ZhangPiHealth USA, 55 Cambridge Parkway, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. Jin.Zhang@pihealth.ai.
Shuai ZhaoDepartment of Transplantation, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200092, China. zhaoshuai@xinhuamed.com.cn.
Zhangsheng YuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. yuzhangsheng@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8189-5330

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12171318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate treatment response assessment using serial CT scans is essential in oncological clinical trials. However, oncologists' assessment following the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline is subjective, time-consuming, and sometimes fallible. Advanced liver cancer often presents multifocal hepatic lesions on CT imaging, making accurate characterization more challenging than with other malignancies. In this work, we developed a tumor volume guided comprehensive objective response evaluation based on deep learning (RECORD) for liver cancer. RECORD performs liver tumor segmentation, followed by sum of the volume (SOV)-based treatment response classification and new lesion assessment. Then, it can provide treatment evaluations of response, stability, and progression, and calculates progression-free survival (PFS) and response time. The RECORD pipeline was developed with both CNN and ViT backbones. Its performance was evaluated in three longitudinal cohorts involving 60 multi-national centers, 206 patients, 891 CT scans, using internal five-fold cross-validation and external validations. RECORD with the most effective backbone achieved an average AUC-response of 0.981, AUC-stable of 0.929, and AUC-progression of 0.969 for SOV-based disease status classification, F1-score of 0.887 for new lesion identification, and accuracy of 0.889 for final treatment outcome assessments across all cohorts. RECORD's PFS and response time predictions strongly correlated with clinician's assessments (P < 0.001). Moreover, RECORD can better stratify high-risk versus low-risk patients for overall survival compared to the human-assessed RECIST results. In conclusion, RECORD demonstrates efficiency and objectivity in analyzing liver lesions for treatment response evaluation. Further research should extend the pipeline to other metastatic organ sites.

Identifiers

PMID39551847
PMCPMC11570623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.