ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Deep learning for oncologic treatment outcomes and endpoints evaluation from CT scans in liver cancer.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semi-automatic mask guidance enhances 3D tumor segmentation in medical imaging.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Based Liver-Related Semantic Segmentation Techniques and Applications Using CT Imaging.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Accuracy and reproducibility of large language model measurements of liver metastases: comparison with radiologist measurements.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- AI-engineered multifunctional nanoplatforms: synergistically bridging precision diagnosis and intelligent therapy in next-generation oncology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for multi-time-point arterial phase contrast-enhanced MRI profiling to predict prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- MuTATE: an interpretable multi-endpoint machine learning framework for automated molecular subtyping in cancer.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Improving early liver metastasis detection in colorectal cancer using a weighted ensemble of ResNet50 and swin transformer: a KHCC study.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate treatment response assessment using serial CT scans is essential in oncological clinical trials. However, oncologists' assessment following the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline is subjective, time-consuming, and sometimes fallible. Advanced liver cancer often presents multifocal hepatic lesions on CT imaging, making accurate characterization more challenging than with other malignancies. In this work, we developed a tumor volume guided comprehensive objective response evaluation based on deep learning (RECORD) for liver cancer. RECORD performs liver tumor segmentation, followed by sum of the volume (SOV)-based treatment response classification and new lesion assessment. Then, it can provide treatment evaluations of response, stability, and progression, and calculates progression-free survival (PFS) and response time. The RECORD pipeline was developed with both CNN and ViT backbones. Its performance was evaluated in three longitudinal cohorts involving 60 multi-national centers, 206 patients, 891 CT scans, using internal five-fold cross-validation and external validations. RECORD with the most effective backbone achieved an average AUC-response of 0.981, AUC-stable of 0.929, and AUC-progression of 0.969 for SOV-based disease status classification, F1-score of 0.887 for new lesion identification, and accuracy of 0.889 for final treatment outcome assessments across all cohorts. RECORD's PFS and response time predictions strongly correlated with clinician's assessments (P < 0.001). Moreover, RECORD can better stratify high-risk versus low-risk patients for overall survival compared to the human-assessed RECIST results. In conclusion, RECORD demonstrates efficiency and objectivity in analyzing liver lesions for treatment response evaluation. Further research should extend the pipeline to other metastatic organ sites.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.