ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on SAR image quality evaluation method based on improved harris hawk optimization algorithm and XGBoost.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based method for analyzing stress distribution in a ship.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research on early warning model of coal spontaneous combustion based on interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of an Intelligent Tablet Press Machine for the In-Line Detection of Defective Tablets Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is crucial for military reconnaissance and remote sensing, but image quality can be affected by various factors, impacting target detection performance. Thus, pre-evaluation of SAR image quality is essential to filter out poor-quality images, optimize resource allocation, and enhance detection accuracy and efficiency. This paper proposes a comprehensive SAR image quality evaluation method combining objective and subjective approaches. Specifically, the processes encompassing the generation of a series of disturbed SAR images on the SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD), the calculation of various objective quality indicators for those images, and the assignment of a subjective quality label to each image through subjective evaluation. Based on the dataset constructed by the above evaluation methods, the IHHO-XGBoost model was developed. This model uses an improved harris hawk optimization (IHHO) algorithm to optimize extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) hyperparameters. The IHHO algorithm effectively alleviates the problem of getting trapped in local optima by improving the escape energy calculation strategy and integrating the average difference evolution mechanism while maintaining the diversity of the population, showing significant advantages over the traditional HHO algorithm. Comparative experiments demonstrate the model's superiority in SAR image quality evaluation. This study validates the scientificity and practicability of the proposed method, offering new tools for SAR image quality research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.