Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551817›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Research on SAR image quality evaluation method based on improved harris hawk optimization algorithm and XGBoost.

Min Huang, Hang Zhao, Yazhou Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min Huang *Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China.
Hang Zhao *College of Information Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, 050018, China.
Yazhou ChenArmy Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang, 050003, China. chen_yazhou@sina.com.

Funding

the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program JCKYS2022DC10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is crucial for military reconnaissance and remote sensing, but image quality can be affected by various factors, impacting target detection performance. Thus, pre-evaluation of SAR image quality is essential to filter out poor-quality images, optimize resource allocation, and enhance detection accuracy and efficiency. This paper proposes a comprehensive SAR image quality evaluation method combining objective and subjective approaches. Specifically, the processes encompassing the generation of a series of disturbed SAR images on the SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD), the calculation of various objective quality indicators for those images, and the assignment of a subjective quality label to each image through subjective evaluation. Based on the dataset constructed by the above evaluation methods, the IHHO-XGBoost model was developed. This model uses an improved harris hawk optimization (IHHO) algorithm to optimize extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) hyperparameters. The IHHO algorithm effectively alleviates the problem of getting trapped in local optima by improving the escape energy calculation strategy and integrating the average difference evolution mechanism while maintaining the diversity of the population, showing significant advantages over the traditional HHO algorithm. Comparative experiments demonstrate the model's superiority in SAR image quality evaluation. This study validates the scientificity and practicability of the proposed method, offering new tools for SAR image quality research.

Identifiers

PMID39551817
PMCPMC11570619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.