ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of contrast media on CT bone density assessment: comparative analysis of low-dose chest CT and abdominopelvic CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunistic Screening on Chest CT, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026Review
- Opportunistic osteoporosis assessment from routine CT-effect of intravenous contrast agents on absolute values, T-scores, and derived classifications in single- and dual-energy CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using multiphase abdominal CT: reliable proximal femur BMD assessment with AI-assisted segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting individuals with low bone mineral density (BMD) before clinical fractures occur may help improve the outcomes of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Although computed tomography (CT) is useful for opportunistic BMD measurement, the modality most suitable for opportunistic screening remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we compared the diagnostic performance of low-dose chest CT (LDCT) and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT (APCT) for measuring BMD at L1 level using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a reference in individuals who underwent LDCT, APCT, and DEXA assessments on the same day. We included 512 individuals (median age: 60 years; interquartile range, 55-65 years; 307 men). Both LDCT (r = 0.706; P < 0.001) and APCT (r = 0.643; P < 0.001) exhibited strong correlation with DEXA T-scores. As T-scores decreased, the relative difference between LDCT and APCT Hounsfield unit values increased (b = - 6.456; P < 0.001). LDCT outperformed APCT in diagnosing both osteoporosis (AUC, 0.865 vs. 0.833; P = 0.035) and low BMD (AUC, 0.844 vs. 0.815; P = 0.006), which may be attributable to the greater effect of intravenous contrast media on CT scan characteristics in individuals with lower T-scores. These results may help inform the selection of imaging methods suitable for screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.