Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551759›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2024

The KLF16/MYC feedback loop is a therapeutic target in bladder cancer.

Lisi Zheng, Jingxuan Wang, Shan Han, Li Zhong, Zefu Liu, Bin Li, Ruhua Zhang, Liwen Zhou, Xianchong Zheng, Zhenhua Liu and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Correction: The KLF16/MYC feedback loop is a therapeutic target in bladder cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lisi Zheng *Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jingxuan Wang *Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Shan Han *Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhongSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zefu LiuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Bin LiMOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, People's Republic of China.
Ruhua ZhangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Liwen ZhouSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xianchong ZhengSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zhenhua LiuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Cuiling ZengSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ruonan LiSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yezi ZouSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Liqin WangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. wanglq1@sysucc.org.cn.
Yuanzhong WuSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. wuyzh@sysucc.org.cn.
Tiebang KangSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. kangtb@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515030292Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center PT22272101Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2021YFA1300601National Natural Science Foundation of China 82030090National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172939National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302928National Natural Science Foundation of China 82341015National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer (BLCA) is a common malignancy characterized by dysregulated transcription and a lack of effective therapeutic targets. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate novel targets with clinical potential essential for tumor growth in BLCA.

methodsCRISPR-Cas9 screening was used to identify transcription factors essential for bladder cancer cell viability. The biological functions of KLF16 in bladder cancer were investigated both in vitro and in vivo. The regulatory mechanism between KLF16 and MYC was elucidated through a series of analyses, including RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), RNA immunoprecipitation, Western blotting, Mass spectrometry, Dual-luciferase reporter assays, Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) sequencing, OptoDroplets assays, and RNA stability assay. The clinical relevance of KLF16 and MYC in bladder cancer was evaluated through analyses of public databases and immunohistochemistry.

resultsKrüppel-like factor 16 (KLF16) was essential for BLCA cell viability. Elevated expression of KLF16 was observed in bladder cancer tissues, and higher expression levels of KLF16 were correlated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities in BLCA patients. Mechanistically, KLF16 mRNA competed with the mRNA of dual-specificity phosphatase 16 (DUSP16) for binding to the RNA-binding protein, WW domain binding protein 11 (WBP11), resulting in destabilization of the DUSP16 mRNA. This, in turn, led to activation of ERK1/2, which stabilized the MYC protein. Furthermore, KLF16 interacted with MYC to form nuclear condensates, thereby enhancing MYC's transcriptional activity. Additionally, MYC transcriptionally upregulated KLF16, creating a positive feedback loop between KLF16 and MYC that amplified their oncogenic functions. Targeting this loop with bromodomain inhibitors, such as OTX015 and ABBV-744, suppressed the transcription of both KLF16 and MYC, resulting in reduced BLCA cell viability and tumor growth, as well as increased sensitivity to chemotherapy.

conclusionsOur study revealed the crucial role of the KLF16/MYC regulatory axis in modulating tumor growth and chemotherapy sensitivity in BLCA, suggesting that combining bromodomain inhibitors, such as OTX015 or ABBV-744, with DDP or gemcitabine could be a promising therapeutic intervention for BLCA patients.

Indexed as

Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceMice, NudeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycKLF16 protein, humanKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycBET inhibitorsBladder cancerChemotherapy sensitivityKLF16MYC

Identifiers

PMID39551759
PMCPMC11571712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.