ArticleBMC oral health2024
Reduction of aerosol and droplet dispersions using intraoral and extraoral vacuums for dental treatments with face-up, diagonal and upright positions.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected lives and dental treatment. Aerosols and droplets generated during dental treatment present a risk of infection for dental care workers. However, detailed elucidation of the conditions under which those are generated has yet to be presented, and no clear countermeasures for protection have been established. The present study aimed to clarify the process of generation of aerosol and droplets in dental treatment, as well as their dynamics for establishment of effective countermeasures and protection strategies.
methodsImages were obtained using a high-speed camera of aerosol and droplets generated during dental treatments performed on a mannequin. The effects of intraoral vacuum and extraoral vacuum to reduce those, as well as splash range with different body position were examined. Quantitative evaluations of aerosol and droplets were also performed using water-sensitive paper.
resultsAerosol and droplets quantities were significantly reduced by use of both intraoral and extraoral vacuums as compared to no vacuum in both image analysis and findings obtained with water-sensitive paper (p < 0.05). Additionally, the intensity of aerosol and droplets when using the intraoral and extraoral vacuum devices with a body position of 45 degrees was a significantly less as compared to the other settings (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated the effectiveness of visualization of the aerosol and droplets generated by dental tools using a high-speed camera. Use of an extraoral vacuum resulted in a reduction of those generated during simulated dental treatment, and also contributed to diffusion prevention to protect the operator and assistant. Nevertheless, it is necessary to be careful because the use of extraoral vacuums may reverse the spread of aerosol and droplets depending on the position of patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.