Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551728›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024

Fundamental care in the emergency room: insights from patients with life-threatening conditions in the emergency room.

Veronica Pavedahl, Åsa Muntlin, Ulrica Von Thiele Schwarz, Martina Summer Meranius, Inger K Holmström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veronica PavedahlSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna Västerås, Sweden Holmström, Eskilstuna Västerås, Åsa, Sweden. veronica.pavedahl@kau.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2084-6284
Åsa MuntlinDepartment of Prehospital and Emergency Care and Area 3, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulrica Von Thiele SchwarzSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna Västerås, Sweden Holmström, Eskilstuna Västerås, Åsa, Sweden.
Martina Summer MeraniusSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna Västerås, Sweden Holmström, Eskilstuna Västerås, Åsa, Sweden.
Inger K HolmströmSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Eskilstuna Västerås, Sweden Holmström, Eskilstuna Västerås, Åsa, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons who become life-threateningly ill or injured (due to for example trauma or cardiac arrest) are cared for in hospitals' designated emergency rooms at the emergency department (ED). In these rooms, the life-threatening condition and biomedical focus may reinforce a culture that value the medical-technical care. Meeting patients fundamental care needs (integrating physical, psychosocial and relational care needs) in a person-centred way might hence be challenging in emergency rooms. Little is known about how person-centred fundamental care is experienced and valued by vulnerable and exposed patients in emergency rooms. This study aims to describe fundamental care needs experienced by patients with a life-threating condition in the emergency room.

methodsA descriptive deductive qualitative study with individual interviews were carried out with 15 patients who had been life-threateningly ill or injured and admitted in an emergency room, in Sweden. Data collection was conducted during 2022. Transcribed interviews were analyzed with deductive content analysis, based on the Fundamentals of Care framework.

resultsDespite being life-threateningly ill or injured, patients were still able to describe their unique needs-which were not only related to biomedical care. A relationship was established between healthcare professionals and the patient in the initial stage, but not maintained during their stay at the emergency room. Patients felt their physical needs were met to a greater extent than psychosocial and relational needs, despite their prioritizing the latter. Patients preferred personalized care but described care as task oriented. The physical environment limited patients from having their fundamental care needs met, and they adopted to a "patient role" to avoid adding to staff stress. The emergency room situation evoked existential thoughts.

conclusionsThis paper provides unique insights into patients' experiences of being cared for in an emergency room. From the patient perspective, physical care was not enough. Relationship, timely and personalized information, and existential needs were identified as essential fundamental care needs, which were not, or only partly met. The finding highlights the need to embed and prioritize fundamental care in practice also for patients who are life-threateningly ill or injured, which in turn calls for focus on organizational prerequisites to enable person-centred fundamental care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSwedenEmergency careEmergency departmentEmergency roomFundamentals of careInterview studyPatient experiencesPerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID39551728
PMCPMC11571529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.