Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551647›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry2025

Practical Assessment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: Updated Reliability, Validity, and Cutoffs for the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire.

David Andrés González, John-Christopher A Finley, Samantha Evy Schoeneman Patel, Jason R Soble

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Andrés GonzálezDepartment of Neurological Sciences (DAG, SESP), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: david_a_gonzalez@rush.edu.
John-Christopher A FinleyDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences (JCAF), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Samantha Evy Schoeneman PatelDepartment of Neurological Sciences (DAG, SESP), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jason R SobleDepartments of Psychiatry & Neurology (JRS), University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

ACTIV Integration of Host-targeting Therapies for COVID-19 Administrative Coordinating CenterOT2HL156812 · NHLBI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI NOLEN, TRACY L, THOMAS, SONIA M · 2020 to 2024
$1270.7M
National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Katherine P Rankin · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRADFORD C DICKERSON · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DOUGLAS R GALASKO · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sanjay Asthana · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KEJAL KANTARCI · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Margaret Sewell · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PHILIP L DE JAGER · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI C. Elizabeth Shaaban · 2020 to 2026
$29.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL156812NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068024NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068077NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068082NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066506NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079280NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH115855NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo improve assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) by expanding the measurement properties of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q).

designMulticenter, longitudinal observational study.

settingSeveral Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs).

participantsIndividuals (n = 45,274) who presented to an ADRC with a collateral and completed the NPI-Q. MEASUREMENTS: The NPI-Q total severity score, four NPI-Q subscales, dementia stage, expert NPS rating, consensus rating of dementia syndrome, global cognitive screening, collateral rating of daily functioning, and self-rating of depression.

resultsThere was strong evidence of criterion validity with both dementia stage and expert NPS rating for the NPI-Q total severity index, which informed cutoffs and interpretive ranges. Furthermore, subscales had adequate classification of dementia syndromes and appropriate convergent relationships with cognition, daily functioning, and mood. There was good-to-excellent evidence of reliability for the NPI-Q total severity index over several years, and subscales had adequate-to-good reliability.

conclusionsThis is the first study to provide empirically established cutoffs, interpretive ranges, and evidence of reliability over a period longer than a month on the NPI-Q and its subscales. This will improve assessment of NPS in clinical and research contexts. ARTICLE SUMMARY: Neuropsychiatric symptoms of neurodegeneration are increasingly understood as early disease markers with tremendous functional impact later in disease, but are often missed or misdiagnosed. The most common measure of these symptoms, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q), does not have clinically actionable guidance, which this article provided. We established cutscores for several conditions and test-retest reliability over longer periods for the total score and subscales using a multicenter database.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioral and psychological symptoms of dementianeuropsychiatric inventory questionnaireneuropsychiatric symptomspsychometricsreliabilityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID39551647
PMCPMC11903187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.