Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551609›Full record

ArticleClinical implant dentistry and related research2025

Transitional implants in computer-assisted implant surgery and fixed complete-arch provisionalization: A retrospective case series.

Ignacio Pedrinaci, Betty Ben Dor, Dominique Rousson, Alejandro Lanis, Javier Sanz-Esporrin, Kevser Pala, German O Gallucci, Adam Hamilton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ignacio PedrinaciDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-5044
Betty Ben DorDMD Candidate, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3203-1505
Dominique RoussonDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alejandro LanisDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1234-4543
Javier Sanz-EsporrinSection of Graduate Periodontology, School of Dentistry, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-3149
Kevser PalaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
German O GallucciDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-594X
Adam HamiltonDepartment of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Science, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1523-1904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUsing mini implants as transitional implants (TIs) for complete arch implant-supported rehabilitations may overcome limitations associated with mucosa-supported surgical guides and facilitate immediate fixed provisionalization. This study aimed to assess the success of TIs in supporting surgical guides for implant placement and fixed provisional prostheses.

methodsPatients who received TIs between 2012 and 2023 for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis were evaluated retrospectively. Patient demographic data, TI functionality in supporting a surgical guide and supporting a complete arch provisional prosthesis, and dates of TI placement and regular implant placement were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the survival rate and success rate for TIs.

resultsTwenty-six patients, 35 jaws, 136 TIs, and 216 regular implants were included. The survival rate of TIs was 74.26%; however, the use of TIs yielded success in 97% of jaws for supporting a surgical guide and a fixed complete-arch provisional prosthesis throughout the complete provisional phase. An average of 4 TIs per maxilla and 3 TIs per mandible supported surgical guides. Thirty-five provisional prostheses were placed on an average of 4 TIs in the maxilla and 3 TIs in the mandible. Thirty-four provisional prostheses were successfully supported by TIs and regular implants until final restoration delivery. The survival of regular implants placed in conjunction with the use of TIs was 98%.

conclusionsUsing TIs to support a surgical guide and provisional prosthesis may be a predictable approach with a high success rate. All surgical guides planned to be supported on TIs were successful. Despite premature loss or replacement of TIs, this approach was able to support most provisional prostheses until the regular implants could be loaded.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesDental Implantsedentulous mandibleedentulous maxillafixed implant prosthesesfull‐archretrospectivesurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID39551609
PMCPMC11798889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.