ArticleBMJ open2024
Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to describe (1) differences between subjects with patellofemoral pain (PFP) with and without pain during prolonged sitting (PDPS), (2) minimum knee flexion angle and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS and (3) differences between those with PDPS at smaller/greater flexion angles and with fast/slow onset and disappearance of PDPS.
designPatient-reported online questionnaire.
settingPrivate physical therapy clinics in the Netherlands between May 2021 and March 2023.
participants87 participants (61 (70%) females, mean age 22.0 years (IQR 4.0), body mass index 23.1 (4.7)). OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual Analogue Scale for worst pain (VAS-W) and sitting pain (VAS-W sitting), the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), knee flexion angle to provoke PDPS and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS.
results63 of 87 (72%) participants reported PDPS. Participants with PDPS experienced bilateral symptoms of PFP more frequently (71% vs 46%, p=0.44) and scored 12 points lower on the AKPS (p<0.001). Most participants (85%) reported a minimum knee flexion angle of ≥90°, median time to PDPS onset of 16-20 min and 6-10 min for disappearance. Participants experiencing PDPS at smaller flexion angles exhibited higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (1.0), 6.8 (1.1)) than those at greater flexion angles (5.0 (3.0), for both) (p=0.002, p=0.001). Participants with fast onset of PDPS reported higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (2.0), 6.0 (2.0)) than those with slow onset (5.0 (3.0), 5.0 (4.0)) (p<0.001, p=0.025).
conclusionsParticipants with PDPS reported higher levels of disability than those without. PDPS was typically induced at knee flexion of ≥90°, with delayed onset/disappearance. Higher pain levels were reported by those experiencing PDPS at smaller knee flexion angles or with faster onset. Future research should explore the mechanisms of PDPS and develop targeted interventions to improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.