ArticleBMJ global health2024
Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Producing Training Resources to Improve Healthcare Experiences for Young Women and Reduce Gendered Health Inequalities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Patient and public involvement, engagement, and participation in practice: co-production of a creative health approach and theory of change through the ReCITE consortium-building project in Liverpool.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Intersectional experiences of non-communicable diseases and health seeking strategies in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Complicity or accountability? The limits of positionality statements.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Healthcare in the Margins: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Access and Utilization in Bangladesh's Informal Urban Settlements.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025Article
- Navigating power in policy adoption: The political economy of noncommunicable diseases in Sierra Leone.SSM - health systems · 2025Article
- MoLEP-Co-creating a Mycobacterium leprae transmission interruption program for the Morogoro region, Tanzania.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Health seeking by people living with non-communicable diseases in a pluralistic health system: the role of informal healthcare providers.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Transforming health equity through academic integration: ripple effects of high-impact practices in CBPR with refugee-origin Montagnard youth.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Ugandan youth public health ambassador program: a community-based public health initiative.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- "Making our voices count": patient action groups as a strategy to engage people with lived experience in implementation of an intervention for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Changing habits of mind: Seven concrete lessons for aspiring community-based researchers.Journal of occupational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Equitable health research requires actively engaging communities in producing new knowledge to advocate for their health needs. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) relies on the coproduction of contextual and grounded knowledge between researchers, programme implementers and community partners with the aim of catalysing action for change. Improving coproduction competencies can support research quality and validity. Yet, frameworks and guidance highlighting the ideal competencies and conditions needed for all research partners to contribute meaningfully and equitably are lacking. This paper aims to advance CBPR by laying out seven core competencies and conditions that can promote power sharing in knowledge production, application and dissemination at the individual, community, organisational and systems levels.Competencies were developed through an iterative process, that synthesised pre-existing literature and frameworks with a wide range of tacit knowledge from researchers, activists, implementation partners and community researchers from Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Sierra Leone and the UK.The seven core competencies and conditions are: (1) capacity to interpret and respond to individual and relational identity, connection, uniqueness and inequities; (2) ability of communities and partners to work in the most suitable, inclusive and synergistic way; (3) aptitude for generating safe and inclusive spaces for multidirectional knowledge and skills exchange that goes beyond the research focus; (4) expertise in democratic leadership and/or facilitation to balance competing priorities and ensure shared decision-making; (5) capacity to analyse readiness for action, successes and areas for improvements throughout the research process; (6) ability to instigate sustainable change processes within the political dimensions of systems, policies and practices using advocacy, lobbying or activism approaches and (7) skills to interpret and disseminate findings and outputs that are understandable, respectful and promote community ownership. We present core competency and condition areas, individual and collective expertise associated with competencies, likely outcomes, examples of activities and sources of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.