Systemic treatment of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with mesenchymal stromal cells: a scoping review of the literature and conclusions for future clinical research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. MesenSistem-EB: systemic haploidentical mesenchymal stem cell therapy in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa associated with clinical benefits and correlated with MCP1 and sCD40L dynamics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
   Trial
2. Mesenchymal stromal cell infusions of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in children with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (MissionEB): a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover, phase 3 trial with an internal phase 1 dose de-escalation phase.EClinicalMedicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as