Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551434›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Vitamin Status Biomarkers in the Genome-Wide Association Study Era: Biological Insights and Clinical Significance.

William R Reay, Erin D Clarke, Clara Albiñana, Liang-Dar Hwang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William R ReayMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. Electronic address: william.reay@utas.edu.au.
Erin D ClarkeFood and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia; School of Health Sciences, the University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Clara AlbiñanaBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; National Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Liang-Dar HwangInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamins play an intrinsic role in human health and are targets for clinical intervention through dietary or pharmacological approaches. Biomarkers of vitamin status are complex traits, measurable phenotypes that arise from an interplay between dietary and other environmental factors with a genetic component that is polygenic, meaning many genes are plausibly involved. Studying these genetic influences will improve our knowledge of fundamental vitamin biochemistry, refine estimates of the effects of vitamins on human health, and may in future prove clinically actionable. Here, we evaluate genetic studies of circulating and excreted biomarkers of vitamin status in the era of hypothesis-free genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that have provided unprecedented insights into the genetic architecture of these traits. We found that the most comprehensive and well-powered GWAS currently available were for circulating status biomarkers of vitamin A, C, D, and a subset of the B vitamins (B

Indexed as

BiomarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyNutritional StatusVitaminsClinical RelevanceHumansVitamin ABiomarkersVitamin AVitaminsGenome-wide association studiesMendelian randomizationnutritional epidemiologypolygenic scoresvitamin status biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39551434
PMCPMC11653147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.