ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Nine Myths about Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults: An Expert Perspective.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of disease related malnutrition assessed by NRS2002, STAMP, MNA-SF, one-step and two-step GLIM at admission and discharge: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Intermittent versus continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of a prediction model for early anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Ultra-early postoperative endoscopy reduces anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the King's Stool Chart in patients receiving enteral nutrition.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Physiological effects of prone positioning during invasive mechanical ventilation: beyond PaOIntensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Interruptions of enteral nutrition in intensive care units: mechanisms, clinical impacts, and precision nursing interventions-a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Case Report: Acute complete esophageal obstruction associated with intraesophageal coagulation of RuiNeng enteral nutrition formula.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The impact of early nutritional support on in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis caused by bacterial or viral infections: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Personalized Nutrition Strategies for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review on the Future of Critical Care Nutrition.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Enteral feeding protocol: a quality improvement project on feeding interruptions and clinical outcomes in a tertiary intensive care unit.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Nutritional Management of Very Sick Patients: Paradigm Changes and Needs for Further Research.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malnutrition is a well-studied and significant prognostic risk factor for morbidity and mortality in critically ill perioperative patients. Common nutrition myths in the critically ill may prevent early, consistent, and adequate delivery of enteral nutrition. We outlined 9 common intensive care unit (ICU) nutrition misconceptions and our recommendations to optimize enteral nutrition in critically ill patients based on the review of available literature. Our approach is to treat every patient admitted to the ICU as at risk for malnutrition and to initiate enteral nutrition upon admission in the absence of contraindications. Early enteral nutrition via the gastric route is more beneficial than delaying feeding while awaiting small bowel access and daytime-intermittent nutrition support can safely be initiated over continuous feeding. Gastric residual volumes to assess feeding tolerance should no longer be routinely measured. For perioperative nutrition, we recommend continuing enteral nutrition for most patients with secure airways undergoing anesthesia and resuming nutrition within 24 h of abdominal surgery; even patients with open abdomens can be safely fed in the absence of bowel injury. Critically ill patients who are proned, paralyzed, and on vasopressors can usually continue enteral nutrition. Finally, continuing enteral nutrition before extubation may optimize nutrition without compromising extubation success. In this review, we highlight several common misconceptions regarding ICU nutrition that may prevent achieving nutrition goals and subsequently lead to increased malnutrition, morbidity, and mortality. This knowledge may contribute to increased implementation of early and consistent enteral nutrition strategies to improve outcomes in critically ill adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.