ArticleJournal of advanced research2025
Attention over vulnerable brain regions associating cerebral palsy disorder and biological markers.
Article in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebral palsy (CP) is a neurological disorder caused by cerebral ischemia and hypoxia during fetal brain development.Early intervention in CP favors medications and therapies; however, monitoring early brain development in children with CP is critical. It is essential to thoroughly examine brain-vulnerable regions associated with biological traits (BTs).Variations in BTs were evident in children with CP; however, it is critical to explore the BTs' impact on the brains of healthy controls (HC) and CP-disordered children.
objectiveThis study associates BTs with HC and CP children.This study investigates the neurodevelopment of HC and CP underlying BTs. This study establishes a benchmark for the association of BT with HC and CP children.
methodThe proposed AWG-Net is composed of customized spatial-channel (CSC) and multi-head self (MHA) attentions, where CSC blocks are incorporated at the first few stages, MHA at later stages, and cumulative-dense structures to propagate susceptible regions to deeper layers. The training samples include T1-w, T2-w, Flair, and Sag, annotated with age, gender, and weight.
resultsThe significant results for HC and CP are age (HC: MAE = 1.05, MCS
conclusionAge and gender are marginally less affected by the brain regions vulnerable to CP than weight estimation. T1-w is appropriate for age, weight, and gender. The learned trends are different for HC and CP in brain development and gender while slightly different in the case of weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.