Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39551108›Full record

ArticleMicrobial pathogenesis2025

The biofilm produced by Cryptococcus neoformans protects the fungus from the antifungal and anti-melanin effects of cyclosporine.

Iara Bastos de Andrade, Vinícius Alves, Dario Correa-Junior, Igor Avellar-Moura, Juliana Soares, Glauber Ribeiro de Sousa Araújo, Bruno Pontes, Joshua D Nosanchuk, Rodrigo Almeida-Paes, Susana Frases

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial pathogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Iara Bastos de AndradeLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Vinícius AlvesLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Departments of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases) and Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Dario Correa-JuniorLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Igor Avellar-MouraLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Juliana SoaresLaboratório de Pinças Ópticas Moysés Nussenzveig (LPO), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Glauber Ribeiro de Sousa AraújoLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Bruno PontesLaboratório de Pinças Ópticas Moysés Nussenzveig (LPO), Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Centro Nacional de Biologia Estrutural e Bioimagem (CENABIO), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Rede Micologia RJ, FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Joshua D NosanchukDepartments of Medicine (Division of Infectious Diseases) and Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Rodrigo Almeida-PaesRede Micologia RJ, FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: rodrigo.paes@ini.fiocruz.br.
Susana FrasesLaboratório de Biofísica de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Rede Micologia RJ, FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

The biology of Cryptococcus neoformans melanizationR01AI171093 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Arturo Casadevall, JOSHUA D NOSANCHUK · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Development and optimization of a nitric oxide releasing microparticle-basedtopical treatment for onychomycosisR41AI165204 · NIAID · ZYLO THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI DRAGANSKI, ANDREW R, NOSANCHUK, JOSHUA D · 2022 to 2023
$600k
Candida auris extracellular vesicles subvert host immune responsesR21AI156104 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NOSANCHUK, JOSHUA D · 2021 to 2022
$462k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI171093NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI156104NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI165204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis requires a detailed analysis of the various virulence factors that contribute to its ability to cause disease. Cyclosporine, calcineurin inhibitor, impairs C. neoformans production of a polysaccharide capsule and secretion of urease, which are critical for cryptococcal pathogenesis. Two particularly important virulence factors are the production of cell wall melanin and formation of biofilm. In this study, we investigated cyclosporine's effects on melanin production and biofilm formation in C. neoformans. Initially, we examined melanin production in planktonic cells treated with cyclosporine using an L-DOPA containing melanin-inducing medium. Visual inspection and optical microscopy revealed a notable reduction in the characteristic dark coloration of cultures treated with cyclosporine, which indicate decreased melanin production in daughter cells compared to mother cells. Spectrophotometric analysis also demonstrated a significantly altered ultraviolet-visible (UV/vis) absorption spectra in cyclosporine-treated yeast cells, indicative of structural changes in melanin. Additionally, cyclosporine-treated cells exhibited reduced conductance (P-value < 0.0001), suggesting altered cellular ionic properties. The impact of cyclosporine on biofilm formation and mature biofilm disruption was also assessed. Despite cyclosporine's efficacy in modifying virulence factors during planktonic growth, cyclosporine did not inhibit biofilm formation or melanization under biofilm growth conditions, nor did it disrupt mature biofilms in terms of biomass or metabolic activity. However, there was a significant reduction in extracellular matrix production in cyclosporine-treated non-melanized biofilms. Our findings underscore the complex interplay between cyclosporine and C. neoformans, highlighting its differential effects on melanization and biofilm dynamics, which provides new insights into the shortcomings of cyclosporin for combatting cryptococcosis and informs pathways for future therapeutic strategies against cryptococcosis.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsCryptococcus neoformansCyclosporineMelaninsCell WallCryptococcosisMicrobial Sensitivity TestsVirulence FactorsAntifungal AgentsCyclosporineMelaninsVirulence FactorsBiofilmCryptococcosiscyclosporineMelanization

Identifiers

PMID39551108
PMCPMC11778809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.