Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2025
Effect of a community-based intervention for sexually transmitted infections on population-level prevalence among youth in Zimbabwe (STICH): a cluster-randomised trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03719521 (Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth: a Cluster Randomised Trial in Zimbabwe (CHIEDZA)
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Duplex, extraction-free, HiFi-LAMP assay for point-of-care detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Opportunities to Improve the Implementation of Relational Health Interventions for Children and Families: A Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYoung people are at particularly high risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We conducted a trial to investigate the effect of a community-based intervention that included STI screening among youth on population-level prevalence of STIs in Zimbabwe.
methodsSTICH was a parallel-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial nested within CHIEDZA, a trial of community-based integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health services for youth in Zimbabwe. STICH was conducted in Harare and Bulawayo provinces with eight clusters in each province, randomised 1:1 to control (existing health services) or to the intervention: community-based screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (males and females) and Trichomonas vaginalis (females only) offered over 12 months to intervention cluster residents aged 16-24 years who were attending CHIEDZA. Outcomes were ascertained through a population-level survey immediately after the intervention period, which included young people aged 18-24 years who lived in randomly selected households in each of the 16 clusters. The primary outcome was population prevalence of any (one or more) of the three STIs; secondary outcomes were prevalence of each of the three STIs. The STICH trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN15013425, and the CHIEDZA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03719521.
findingsFrom Oct 6, 2021, to March 8, 2022, 6361 randomly sampled young people were recruited into the outcome survey (median age 20 years [IQR 19-22], 3500 female and 2101 male, 3066 in intervention clusters and 3295 in control clusters). 5601 participants were included in the primary outcome analysis (2756 in intervention clusters and 2845 in control clusters). In the intervention clusters, 612 (22·2%) of 2756 participants reported that they had attended CHIEDZA and 298 (10·8%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the control clusters, 113 (4·0%) of 2845 participants had attended CHIEDZA and 40 (1·4%) had been tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae. In the outcome survey, the cluster-level geometric mean prevalence of the primary outcome (any of C trachomatis, N gonorrhoeae, and T vaginalis) was 19·07% (geometric standard deviation [GSD] 1·20) in the intervention arm versus 19·95% (GSD 1·10) in the control arm (risk ratio [RR] 0·93 [95% CI 0·78-1·10]; p=0·35). There was no difference between arms in geometric mean prevalence of C trachomatis (12·86% [GSD 1·14] in the intervention arm vs 12·94% [GSD 1·15] in the control arm, RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·84-1·11]; p=0·60) or T vaginalis (7·06% [GSD 1·48] vs 6·20% [1·38], RR 1·09 [95% CI 0·74-1·60]; p=0·66). N gonorrhoeae prevalence was significantly lower in the intervention arm, with a 43% risk reduction (geometric mean 1·65% [GSD 1·77] vs 2·87% [1·43], RR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·96]; p=0·036).
interpretationOur study showed high population prevalence of curable STIs. Community-based STI screening appeared to reduce population-level prevalence of N gonorrhoeae, but not of C trachomatis or T vaginalis, probably due to low intervention coverage. Future research is needed on the effects of screening interventions on morbidity, antimicrobial resistance, and re-infection rates.
fundingMedical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department for International Development, National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Wellcome Trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.