Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550622›Full record

ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025

Parotidectomy Trends Toward Outpatient for Benign Disease.

Andrew D P Prince, Kimberly Oslin, Josh D Smith, Emma Hershey, Lisa Chionis, Michael Allevato, Steven B Chinn, Mark E P Prince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Postoperative Opioid Receipt After Parotidectomy and Associations With Persistent Opioid Use Disorder.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew D P PrinceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-7739
Kimberly OslinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Josh D SmithDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Emma HersheyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lisa ChionisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michael AllevatoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Steven B ChinnDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mark E P PrinceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

SHORT-TERM TRAINING IN HEALTH PROF SCHOOLST35HL007690 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FLAHERTY, KEVIN R · 1990 to 2024
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluate the safety of outpatient parotidectomy. We evaluate factors that lead to planned admission and compare costs. We evaluate trends toward outpatient, and the outcomes of switching admission status, total versus superficial approach, and ambulatory versus hospital site. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingSingle tertiary academic center.

methodsRetrospective review of patients who underwent parotidectomy for benign tumors from 2018 to 2023.

resultsOf 370 parotidectomies performed, there were a planned 162 admissions and 208 outpatient procedures. A travel time > 60 minutes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.487, confidence interval [CI]: 0.296-0.803, P = .005) and total parotidectomy (OR = 0.448, CI: 0.226-0.89, P = .022) decreased the odds of a planned outpatient procedure. In a multivariable model, longer operative time increased the odds of switching to inpatient (n = 29, OR = 1.02, CI: 1.007-1.033, P = .002) and drain placement decreased the odds of switching to outpatient (n = 15, OR = 0.035, CI: 0.004-0.298, P = .002). There was no significant difference in surgical complications, phone calls, clinic visits, readmission rates, or recurrence between outpatient and inpatient. This remained true when comparing surgical facility and superficial versus total parotidectomy. After COVID was declared an emergency, there was a trend toward outpatient parotidectomy (72.7% vs 48.9%, P < .001), but no change in complication rates. At our institution, outpatient parotidectomy saved $3838 compared to overnight admission.

conclusionThis study supports that outpatient parotidectomy is safe. This remained true for patients switching admission status, undergoing superficial or total parotidectomy, and having their operation at an ambulatory site. We demonstrate that institutions can safely increase outpatient parotidectomy rates and outpatient parotidectomy is cost effective.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresParotid DiseasesParotid GlandParotid NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective Studiescost analysishead and neckoutcomesparotidectomysafety

Identifiers

PMID39550622
PMCPMC11844334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.