Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39550612›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2024

Hidden water's influence on rhodopsin activation.

Zachary T Bachler, Michael F Brown

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary T BachlerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Michael F BrownDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. Electronic address: mfbrown@arizona.edu.

Funding

MEMBRANE BASIS OF VISUAL EXCITATIONR01EY026041 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BROWN, MICHAEL F · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural biology relies on several powerful techniques, but these tend to be limited in their ability to characterize protein fluctuations and mobility. Overreliance on structural approaches can lead to omission of critical information regarding biological function. Currently there is a need for complementary biophysical methods to visualize these mobile aspects of protein function. Here, we review hydrostatic and osmotic pressure-based techniques to address this shortcoming for the paradigm of rhodopsin. Hydrostatic and osmotic pressure data contribute important examples, which are interpreted in terms of an energy landscape for hydration-mediated protein dynamics. We find that perturbations of rhodopsin conformational equilibria by force-based methods are not unrelated phenomena; rather they probe various hydration states involving functional proton reactions. Hydrostatic pressure acts on small numbers of strongly interacting structural or solvent-shell water molecules with relatively high energies, while osmotic pressure acts on large numbers of weakly interacting bulk-like water molecules with low energies. Local solvent fluctuations due to the hydration shell and collective water interactions affect hydrogen-bonded networks and domain motions that are explained by a hierarchical energy landscape model for protein dynamics.

Indexed as

RhodopsinWaterAnimalsHydrogen BondingHydrostatic PressureOsmotic PressureRhodopsinWater

Identifiers

PMID39550612
PMCPMC11700366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.