ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Evaluating the usability of Iran's national comprehensive health information system: a think-aloud study to uncover usability problems in the recording of childcare data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealth information systems play a crucial role in the delivery of efficient and effective healthcare. Poor usability is one of the reasons for their lack of acceptance and low usage by users. The aim of this study was to identify the usability problems of a national comprehensive health information system using the concurrent think-aloud method in the recording of childcare data.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the health centers of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2020. Ten healthcare providers as system's users were purposively selected to evaluate the system. To identify problems, a concurrent think-aloud evaluation was conducted. Two administrators of the system designed scenarios for ten childcare data recording tasks. By analysing the recorded files, usability problems were identified. The severity of the problems was then determined with the help of the users and problems were assigned to usability attributes based on their impact on the user.
resultsA total of 68 unique problems were identified in the system, of which 47.1% were rated as catastrophic problems. The participants assigned 47 problems (69%) to the user satisfaction attribute and 45 problems (66%) to the efficiency attribute; they also did not assign any problems to the effectiveness attribute.
conclusionThe problems identified in the national comprehensive health information system using the think-aloud method were rated as major and catastrophic, which indicates poor usability of this system. Therefore, resolving the system problems will help increase user satisfaction and system efficiency, allowing more time to be spent on patient care and parent's education as well as improving overall quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.