ArticleBMC emergency medicine2024
What do community paramedics in Germany do regarding the care of older people? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of low-acuity cases.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-life-threatening cases treated by emergency services have been increasing in recent years, especially in older people. In a region in Germany with approximately 600,000 inhabitants, the role of a specially trained community paramedic (Gemeindenotfallsanitäter, G-NFS) was introduced in 2019. The G-NFS is dispatched to low-acuity requests, attends the assignment alone and is allowed to treat patients at home.
aimThe aim of this study was to analyse the assignments attended by the G-NFS relating to the suspected diagnoses, with a focus on older people (≥ 65 years) according to their care setting.
methodsIn this descriptive, retrospective study, we analysed the anonymous assignment report forms 07/2023-12/2023 of cases where patients were aged ≥ 65 years. The suspected diagnoses (free text field) were categorised according to the International Classification of Primary Care 2nd Edition (ICPC-2) scheme. Furthermore, baseline characteristics, urgency of the assignment, provided measures, transport and further treatment were analysed, stratified by care setting.
resultsOf the 1,643 included anonymous assignment report forms, 52.9% (n = 869) related to patients aged ≥ 65 years. In this population, the mean age was 80.7 years (SD 8.2), 49.6% were female and most were in long-term care, whether as home care recipients (34.8%) or as nursing home residents (26.9%). The most frequent diagnoses were categorised as urological (24.9%), general and unspecified (13.7%), circulatory (13.6%), digestive (12.8%), musculoskeletal (11.5%) and respiratory (10.3%). In 52.7% of the cases no transport was necessary, while 73.7% of urological cases did not need to be transported.
conclusionThe G-NFS was dispatched mainly to older people. Most of them were in long-term care and were not transported. The most common suspected diagnoses were categorised as urological, followed by general and unspecified, and circulatory, and differed by care setting. There is a strong need to strengthen outpatient healthcare structures for low-acuity health issues in older and immobile patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.